The Phyllo / InsightIQ alternative
Phyllo returns private creator insights only after each creator connects their own account; herascrape reads public Instagram data for any public profile with no consent flow. herascrape returns structured Instagram JSON across 37 endpoints over a single real-time REST call, at a flat $0.40 per 1,000 with only successful calls billed.
Phyllo / InsightIQ sits in the “official & consent-based apis” tier. Meta’s own API and consent-based creator-data vendors. Sanctioned, but structurally unable to read an arbitrary public profile — they need the account’s own authorization.
Why teams switch from Phyllo / InsightIQ
Phyllo / InsightIQ is priced at ~$199/mo (not per-call); herascrape is a flat $0.40 per 1,000 ($0.0004 per request) at any balance.
Phyllo / InsightIQ is official (consent); herascrape is Instagram-only, with 37 structured endpoints.
Profiles, followers, following, likers, comments, stories, highlights, tagged posts, reels, hashtags and locations — one API.
You pay for successful (2xx) calls only — no quota, credits or units to decode.
herascrape vs Phyllo / InsightIQ
| herascrape | Phyllo / InsightIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Instagram-only | Official (consent) |
| Instagram data | Deep — 37 structured endpoints: profiles, followers, following, likers, comments, stories, highlights, tagged, reels, hashtags, locations | Consent-based creator data (opt-in only); no arbitrary public profiles |
| Data format | Structured JSON | Consent insights |
| API type | REST | Official OAuth REST |
| Delivery | Synchronous | Consent-gated |
| Response time (p90) | 1,720 ms | Not measured |
| Rate limit | 50 req/s (raisable) | Not published |
| Price / 1,000 | $0.40 flat | ~$199/mo (not per-call) |
| Pricing model | Flat per request at any balance; only successful (2xx) calls billed | Consent-OAuth subscription |
| Billing | Only successful (2xx) | Subscription |
| MCP server | Yes | No |
| Client SDKs | Python, JavaScript | Connect SDK (iOS, Android, RN, Flutter, Web) |
| Free tier | $1 free (~2,500 calls) | Demo / quote |
Phyllo / InsightIQ figures verified on their live pages on 2026-10-24; re-check before relying on a number. Trademarks belong to their owners.
Frequently asked questions
- Is herascrape a Phyllo / InsightIQ alternative?
- Phyllo returns private creator insights only after each creator connects their own account; herascrape reads public Instagram data for any public profile with no consent flow.
- How does the pricing compare?
- Phyllo / InsightIQ is priced at ~$199/mo (not per-call) (consent-oauth subscription); herascrape is a flat $0.0004 per request ($0.40 per 1,000) at any balance, billing only successful (2xx) calls.
- What Instagram data does herascrape return?
- Structured JSON across 37 endpoints — profiles, followers, following, likers, comments, stories, highlights, tagged posts, reels, hashtags and locations.
- Is there a free tier?
- herascrape gives $1 free on signup, about 2,500 calls. Phyllo / InsightIQ's free tier: Demo / quote.
- Does herascrape have an MCP server and SDKs?
- Yes — herascrape ships Python and JavaScript SDKs and an MCP server, so you can call it from code or wire it into an AI agent.